Chevrolet Nubira 2005 vs Mazda 3 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 92 HP | 84 HP | |
| Torque: | 131 NM | 122 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 seconds | 14.9 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Nubira is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Nubira engine produces 8 HP more power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 9 NM more than Mazda 3. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Nubira reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 6.7 | |
|
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Nubira consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Nubira could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| Mazda 3 2006 1.4 engine: The engine is generally robust, but the use of poor-quality fuel can lead to increased burn formation. Idling speeds tend to be unstable. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.47 m | |
| Chevrolet Nubira is 1 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Nubira is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 413 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1285 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Nubira is 0.5 metres less than that of the Mazda 3, which means Chevrolet Nubira can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`150 | 1`715 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Nubira has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |