Chevrolet Nubira 2005 vs Kia Ceed 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 109 - 122 HP | 90 - 143 HP | |
Torque: | 147 - 280 NM | 137 - 304 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 - 10.7 seconds | 10.5 - 14 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 - 9.1 | 4.5 - 7.6 | |
Chevrolet Nubira petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Kia Ceed. On average, Chevrolet Nubira equipped with diesel engines consume 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.50 m | 4.49 m | |
Width: | 1.72 m | 1.79 m | |
Height: | 1.44 m | 1.53 m | |
Chevrolet Nubira is 1 cm longer than the Kia Ceed, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Nubira is 9 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 404 litres | 534 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1664 litres | |
Kia Ceed has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chevrolet Nubira has 130 litres less trunk space than the Kia Ceed. This could mean that the Chevrolet Nubira uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.3 meters | |
The turning circle of the Chevrolet Nubira is 0.1 metres more than that of the Kia Ceed. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`246 | ~ 1`888 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | below average | |
Average price (€): | 1400 | 3600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Nubira has
|
Kia Ceed has
| |