Chevrolet Nubira 2005 vs Kia Optima 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 1.8 (petrol) | 2.0 - 2.7 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Kia Optima is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 92 - 122 HP | 140 - 188 HP | |
| Torque: | 131 - 161 NM | 189 - 305 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 - 11.6 seconds | 9.1 - 11.7 seconds | |
| In general, Kia Optima are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Chevrolet Nubira. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 - 9.1 | 6.0 - 9.2 | |
|
Chevrolet Nubira petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Kia Optima. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.74 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Chevrolet Nubira is smaller. Chevrolet Nubira is 24 cm shorter than the Kia Optima, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Nubira is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 405 litres | 496 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1225 litres | 816 litres | |
| Chevrolet Nubira has 91 litres less trunk space than the Kia Optima. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chevrolet Nubira (by 409 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Nubira is 1.4 metres less than that of the Kia Optima, which means Chevrolet Nubira can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`679 kg | ~ 2`013 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`194 kg | ~ 1`475 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 485 kg | ~ 538 kg | |
| Chevrolet Nubira load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 11 procentiem less than Kia Optima. Therefore, Kia Optima is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Nubira has
|
Kia Optima has
| |