Chevrolet Nubira 2005 vs Kia Optima 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 1.8 (petrol) | 2.0 - 2.7 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Kia Optima is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 92 - 122 HP | 140 - 188 HP | |
| Torque: | 131 - 161 NM | 189 - 305 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 - 11.6 seconds | 9.1 - 11.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 - 9.1 | 6.0 - 9.2 | |
|
Chevrolet Nubira petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Kia Optima. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.74 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Chevrolet Nubira is smaller. Chevrolet Nubira is 24 cm shorter than the Kia Optima, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Nubira is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 496 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 816 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Nubira is 1.4 metres less than that of the Kia Optima, which means Chevrolet Nubira can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`181 | ~ 2`013 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Nubira has
|
Kia Optima has
| |