Chevrolet Matiz 2005 vs Suzuki Alto 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.1 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 64 HP | 63 HP | |
| Torque: | 87 NM | 85 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.3 seconds | 14.8 seconds | |
| Chevrolet Matiz engine produces 1 HP more power than Suzuki Alto, whereas torque is 2 NM more than Suzuki Alto. Despite the higher power, Chevrolet Matiz reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 4.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 5.7 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Alto is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Matiz consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Alto, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Matiz could require 225 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Matiz consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Alto. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 38 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 710 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| 570 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
| Suzuki Alto gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.50 m | 3.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.50 m | 1.48 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Matiz and Suzuki Alto are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9 meters | 9.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Matiz is 0.2 metres less than that of the Suzuki Alto. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 795 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Suzuki Alto has
| |