Chevrolet Matiz 2005 vs Suzuki Alto 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 0.8 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 51 HP | 68 HP | |
| Torque: | 69 NM | 90 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17 seconds | 14 seconds | |
|
Suzuki Alto is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Matiz engine produces 17 HP less power than Suzuki Alto, whereas torque is 21 NM less than Suzuki Alto. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Matiz reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 4.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Alto is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Matiz consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Alto, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Matiz could require 255 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Matiz consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Alto. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 38 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 740 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| 630 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Suzuki Alto gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.50 m | 3.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.50 m | 1.60 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.47 m | |
| Chevrolet Matiz and Suzuki Alto are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 129 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 774 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9 meters | 9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 751 | 1`250 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Matiz has
|
Suzuki Alto has
| |