Chevrolet Matiz 2005 vs Suzuki Alto 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 0.8 Petrol | 1.1 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 51 HP | 63 HP | |
| Torque: | 69 NM | 85 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17 seconds | 14.8 seconds | |
|
Suzuki Alto is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Matiz engine produces 12 HP less power than Suzuki Alto, whereas torque is 16 NM less than Suzuki Alto. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Matiz reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 4.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 5.7 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Alto is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Matiz consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Alto, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Matiz could require 180 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Matiz consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Alto. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 38 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 740 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| 630 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.50 m | 3.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.50 m | 1.48 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Matiz and Suzuki Alto are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9 meters | 9.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Matiz is 0.2 metres less than that of the Suzuki Alto. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 751 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Suzuki Alto has
| |