Chevrolet Matiz 2005 vs Kia Picanto 2004
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 0.8 Petrol | 1.1 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 51 HP | 65 HP | |
Torque: | 69 NM | 97 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17 seconds | 15.1 seconds | |
Kia Picanto is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Matiz engine produces 14 HP less power than Kia Picanto, whereas torque is 28 NM less than Kia Picanto. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Matiz reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 4.9 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
By specification Chevrolet Matiz consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Picanto, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Matiz could require 180 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Chevrolet Matiz consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Picanto. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 38 litres | 35 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
740 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
630 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.50 m | 3.50 m | |
Width: | 1.50 m | 1.60 m | |
Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
Chevrolet Matiz and Kia Picanto are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 220 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 882 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 9 meters | 9.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Chevrolet Matiz is 0.2 metres less than that of the Kia Picanto. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 751 | 1`350 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | low | above average | |
Kia Picanto has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Matiz has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Kia Picanto, so Kia Picanto quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 1400 | 1400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Kia Picanto has
| |