Chevrolet Matiz 2005 vs Kia Picanto 2004

 
Chevrolet Matiz
2005 - 2009
Kia Picanto
2004 - 2004
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 0.8 Petrol1.1 Petrol

Performance

Power: 51 HP65 HP
Torque: 69 NM97 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 17 seconds15.1 seconds
Kia Picanto is a more dynamic driving.
Chevrolet Matiz engine produces 14 HP less power than Kia Picanto, whereas torque is 28 NM less than Kia Picanto. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Matiz reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.14.9
Real fuel consumption: 6.0 l/100km6.2 l/100km
By specification Chevrolet Matiz consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Picanto, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Matiz could require 180 litres more fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Chevrolet Matiz consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Picanto.
Fuel tank capacity: 38 litres35 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 620 km in combined cycle710 km in combined cycle
740 km on highway810 km on highway
630 km with real consumption560 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 3.50 m3.50 m
Width: 1.50 m1.60 m
Height: 1.48 m1.48 m
Chevrolet Matiz and Kia Picanto are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: no data220 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data882 litres
Turning diameter: 9 meters9.2 meters
The turning circle of the Chevrolet Matiz is 0.2 metres less than that of the Kia Picanto.
Gross weight (kg): 7511`350
Safety:
Quality:
low

above average
Kia Picanto has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Matiz has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Kia Picanto, so Kia Picanto quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 14001400
Pros and Cons:
    Kia Picanto has
    • more power
    • more dynamic
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    • fewer faults
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv