Chevrolet Matiz 2005 vs Ford KA 1997

 
Chevrolet Matiz
2005 - 2009
Ford KA
1997 - 2004
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 0.8 Petrol1.3 Petrol

Performance

Power: 51 HP60 HP
Torque: 69 NM105 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 17 seconds15.4 seconds
Ford KA is a more dynamic driving.
Chevrolet Matiz engine produces 9 HP less power than Ford KA, whereas torque is 36 NM less than Ford KA. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Matiz reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.16.7
Real fuel consumption: 6.0 l/100km6.8 l/100km
The Chevrolet Matiz is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Chevrolet Matiz consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford KA, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Matiz over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Matiz consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford KA.
Fuel tank capacity: 38 litres42 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 620 km in combined cycle620 km in combined cycle
740 km on highway760 km on highway
630 km with real consumption610 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 3.50 m3.62 m
Width: 1.50 m1.63 m
Height: 1.48 m1.37 m
Chevrolet Matiz is smaller, but higher.
Chevrolet Matiz is 12 cm shorter than the Ford KA, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Matiz is 11 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no data186 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data724 litres
Turning diameter: 9 meters9.8 meters
The turning circle of the Chevrolet Matiz is 0.8 metres less than that of the Ford KA, which means Chevrolet Matiz can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 7511`265
Safety:
Quality:
low

low
Average price (€): 1400800
Pros and Cons: Chevrolet Matiz has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
Ford KA has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv