Chevrolet Matiz 2005 vs Ford KA 1997
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 0.8 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 51 HP | 60 HP | |
Torque: | 69 NM | 105 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17 seconds | 15.4 seconds | |
Ford KA is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Matiz engine produces 9 HP less power than Ford KA, whereas torque is 36 NM less than Ford KA. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Matiz reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 6.7 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
The Chevrolet Matiz is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Matiz consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford KA, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Matiz over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Matiz consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford KA. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 38 litres | 42 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
740 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
630 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.50 m | 3.62 m | |
Width: | 1.50 m | 1.63 m | |
Height: | 1.48 m | 1.37 m | |
Chevrolet Matiz is smaller, but higher. Chevrolet Matiz is 12 cm shorter than the Ford KA, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Matiz is 11 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 186 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 724 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 9 meters | 9.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Chevrolet Matiz is 0.8 metres less than that of the Ford KA, which means Chevrolet Matiz can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 751 | 1`265 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | low | low | |
Average price (€): | 1400 | 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Matiz has
|
Ford KA has
| |