Chevrolet Malibu 2013 vs Peugeot 407 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 259 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 353 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
| Chevrolet Malibu engine produces 123 HP more power than Peugeot 407, whereas torque is 163 NM more than Peugeot 407. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 8.7 | |
| Chevrolet Malibu consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 407, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Malibu could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.68 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Chevrolet Malibu is larger. Chevrolet Malibu is 19 cm longer than the Peugeot 407, 5 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Malibu is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 462 litres | 407 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Malibu has more luggage capacity. Chevrolet Malibu has 55 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 407. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Malibu is 0.6 metres less than that of the Peugeot 407, which means Chevrolet Malibu can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | 1`998 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Malibu has
|
Peugeot 407 has
| |