Chevrolet Malibu 2013 vs Ford Focus 2011

 
Chevrolet Malibu
2013 - 2014
Ford Focus
2011 - 2014
Body: SedanHatchback
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 259 HP150 HP
Torque: 353 NM202 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds9.3 seconds
Chevrolet Malibu engine produces 109 HP more power than Ford Focus, whereas torque is 151 NM more than Ford Focus.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.16.4
The Ford Focus is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Chevrolet Malibu consumes 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Focus, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Malibu could require 405 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 760 km in combined cycle850 km in combined cycle
890 km on highway1120 km on highway
Ford Focus gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.87 m4.36 m
Width: 1.86 m1.82 m
Height: 1.47 m1.48 m
Chevrolet Malibu is larger, but slightly lower.
Chevrolet Malibu is 51 cm longer than the Ford Focus, 3 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Malibu is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 462 litres277 litres
Chevrolet Malibu has more luggage capacity.
Chevrolet Malibu has 185 litres more trunk space than the Ford Focus.
Turning diameter: 11.4 metersno data
Gross weight: no datano data
Safety:
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 72003600
Pros and Cons: Chevrolet Malibu has
  • more power
  • roomier boot
Ford Focus has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv