Chevrolet Malibu 2013 vs Hyundai Elantra 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 259 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 353 NM | 178 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Chevrolet Malibu engine produces 109 HP more power than Hyundai Elantra, whereas torque is 175 NM more than Hyundai Elantra. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 7.1 | |
|
The Hyundai Elantra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Malibu consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Elantra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Malibu could require 300 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 48 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
| Chevrolet Malibu gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Chevrolet Malibu is larger. Chevrolet Malibu is 34 cm longer than the Hyundai Elantra, 8 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Malibu is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 462 litres | 419 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Malibu has more luggage capacity. Chevrolet Malibu has 43 litres more trunk space than the Hyundai Elantra. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Malibu is 0.8 metres more than that of the Hyundai Elantra, which means Chevrolet Malibu can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Malibu has
|
Hyundai Elantra has
| |