Chevrolet Malibu 2012 vs Peugeot 407 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 182 HP | 158 HP | |
| Torque: | 233 NM | 217 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
| Chevrolet Malibu engine produces 24 HP more power than Peugeot 407, whereas torque is 16 NM more than Peugeot 407. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 9.4 | |
|
The Chevrolet Malibu is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Malibu consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 407, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Malibu over 15,000 km in a year you can save 300 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 1110 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| Chevrolet Malibu gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.68 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Chevrolet Malibu is larger. Chevrolet Malibu is 19 cm longer than the Peugeot 407, 5 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Malibu is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 462 litres | 407 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Malibu has more luggage capacity. Chevrolet Malibu has 55 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 407. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Malibu is 0.6 metres less than that of the Peugeot 407, which means Chevrolet Malibu can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | 2`075 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Malibu has
|
Peugeot 407 has
| |