Chevrolet Malibu 2015 vs Chrysler 200 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 250 HP | 187 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 234 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.7 seconds | 9 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Malibu is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Malibu engine produces 63 HP more power than Chrysler 200, whereas torque is 116 NM more than Chrysler 200. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Malibu reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 8.5 | |
| Chevrolet Malibu consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler 200, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Malibu could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 49 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 670 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| Chrysler 200 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chevrolet Camaro, Chevrolet Equinox, Chevrolet Traverse | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jeep Cherokee, Jeep Renegade | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chevrolet Malibu might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.92 m | 4.89 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.49 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Malibu is 4 cm longer than the Chrysler 200, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Malibu is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 447 litres | 453 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Chevrolet Malibu has 6 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler 200. This could mean that the Chevrolet Malibu uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.1 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`487 | 2`092 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Malibu has
|
Chrysler 200 has
| |