Chevrolet Malibu 2015 vs Fiat Tipo 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 124 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 NM | 152 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
| Chevrolet Malibu engine produces 14 HP more power than Fiat Tipo, whereas torque is 23 NM more than Fiat Tipo. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 6.3 | |
|
The Chevrolet Malibu is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Malibu consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Tipo, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Malibu over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 49 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| Chevrolet Malibu gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.92 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Chevrolet Malibu is larger, but slightly lower. Chevrolet Malibu is 39 cm longer than the Fiat Tipo, 6 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Malibu is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 447 litres | 520 litres | |
|
Fiat Tipo has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chevrolet Malibu has 73 litres less trunk space than the Fiat Tipo. This could mean that the Chevrolet Malibu uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`568 | 1`705 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 10 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Malibu has
|
Fiat Tipo has
| |