Chevrolet Malibu 2013 vs Volvo S80 2013

 
Chevrolet Malibu
2013 - 2015
Volvo S80
2013 - 2016
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.5 Petrol3.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 197 HP304 HP
Torque: 259 NM440 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9 seconds6.7 seconds
Volvo S80 is a more dynamic driving.
Chevrolet Malibu engine produces 107 HP less power than Volvo S80, whereas torque is 181 NM less than Volvo S80. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Malibu reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.89.9
The Chevrolet Malibu is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Chevrolet Malibu consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S80, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Malibu over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 73 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 820 km in combined cycle700 km in combined cycle
1050 km on highway950 km on highway
Chevrolet Malibu gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 420'000 km390'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 10 years6 years
Engine spread: Used only for this carInstalled on at least 5 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo S60, Volvo XC70, Volvo XC60, Volvo V60
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.

Dimensions

Length: 4.86 m4.85 m
Width: 1.85 m1.86 m
Height: 1.46 m1.49 m
Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Malibu is 1 cm longer than the Volvo S80, width is practically the same , while the height of Chevrolet Malibu is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 461 litres480 litres
Despite its longer length, Chevrolet Malibu has 19 litres less trunk space than the Volvo S80. This could mean that the Chevrolet Malibu uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: no data11.7 meters
Gross weight (kg): 2`1002`290
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 760010 000
Pros and Cons: Chevrolet Malibu has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • lower price
Volvo S80 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • has 4x4 drive
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv