Chevrolet Malibu 2013 vs Volvo S80 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 197 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 259 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 7.7 seconds | |
|
Volvo S80 is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Malibu engine produces 43 HP less power than Volvo S80, whereas torque is 61 NM less than Volvo S80. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Malibu reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 8.1 | |
|
The Volvo S80 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Malibu consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S80, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Malibu could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 73 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.86 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.49 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Malibu is 1 cm longer than the Volvo S80, width is practically the same , while the height of Chevrolet Malibu is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 461 litres | 480 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Chevrolet Malibu has 19 litres less trunk space than the Volvo S80. This could mean that the Chevrolet Malibu uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`100 | 2`130 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8000 | 11 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Malibu has
|
Volvo S80 has
| |