Chevrolet Malibu 2013 vs Volvo S80 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 197 HP | 181 HP | |
| Torque: | 259 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
|
Volvo S80 is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Malibu engine produces 16 HP more power than Volvo S80, but torque is 141 NM less than Volvo S80. Despite the higher power, Chevrolet Malibu reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 4.5 | |
|
The Volvo S80 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Malibu consumes 4.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S80, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Malibu could require 645 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 73 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 1550 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 1750 km on highway | ||
| Volvo S80 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.86 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.49 m | |
| Chevrolet Malibu is 1 cm longer than the Volvo S80, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Malibu is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 461 litres | 480 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Chevrolet Malibu has 19 litres less trunk space than the Volvo S80. This could mean that the Chevrolet Malibu uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`100 | 2`090 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8000 | 11 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Malibu has
|
Volvo S80 has
| |