Chevrolet Malibu 2013 vs Ford Mondeo 2013

 
Chevrolet Malibu
2013 - 2015
Ford Mondeo
2013 - 2018
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.5 Petrol2.5 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 197 HP149 HP
Torque: 259 NM230 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9 seconds10.3 seconds
Chevrolet Malibu is more dynamic to drive.
Chevrolet Malibu engine produces 48 HP more power than Ford Mondeo, whereas torque is 29 NM more than Ford Mondeo. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Malibu reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.88.2
The Ford Mondeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Chevrolet Malibu consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Malibu could require 90 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 73 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 820 km in combined cycle750 km in combined cycle
Chevrolet Malibu gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 420'000 km560'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Ford Mondeo engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 10 years13 years
Engine spread: Used only for this carUsed also on Ford Kuga
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Ford Mondeo might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: yesno
The Chevrolet Malibu engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.86 m4.87 m
Width: 1.85 m1.85 m
Height: 1.46 m1.48 m
Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Malibu and Ford Mondeo are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 461 litres429 litres
Chevrolet Malibu has more luggage capacity.
Chevrolet Malibu has 32 litres more trunk space than the Ford Mondeo.
Turning diameter: no data11.6 meters
Gross weight (kg): 2`100no data
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
low
Average price (€): 760011 000
Pros and Cons: Chevrolet Malibu has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Ford Mondeo has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • longer expected engine lifespan
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv