Chevrolet Malibu 2013 vs Volkswagen Passat CC 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 197 HP | 210 HP | |
| Torque: | 259 NM | n/a NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 7.8 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Passat CC is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Malibu engine produces 13 HP less power than Volkswagen Passat CC. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Malibu reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 7.8 | |
|
The Volkswagen Passat CC is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Malibu consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat CC, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Malibu could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 73 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 1160 km on highway | ||
| Volkswagen Passat CC gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.86 m | no data | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 461 litres | 532 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Passat CC has more luggage space. Chevrolet Malibu has 71 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Passat CC. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`100 | 1`990 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 7600 | 16 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Malibu has
|
Volkswagen Passat CC has
| |