Chevrolet Malibu 2013 vs Volkswagen Passat CC 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 197 HP | 210 HP | |
| Torque: | 259 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 7.8 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Passat CC is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Malibu engine produces 13 HP less power than Volkswagen Passat CC, whereas torque is 21 NM less than Volkswagen Passat CC. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Malibu reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 7.8 | |
| Chevrolet Malibu consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat CC, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Malibu over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 73 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 1120 km on highway | 1160 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.86 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.42 m | |
| Chevrolet Malibu is 6 cm longer than the Volkswagen Passat CC, width is practically the same , while the height of Chevrolet Malibu is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 461 litres | 532 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Passat CC has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Chevrolet Malibu uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`100 kg | 1`990 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`539 kg | 1`460 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 561 kg | 530 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 7600 | 15 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Malibu has
|
Volkswagen Passat CC has
| |