Chevrolet Malibu 2013 vs Volkswagen Passat CC 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 259 HP | 210 HP | |
| Torque: | 353 NM | n/a NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.7 seconds | 7.8 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Malibu is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Malibu engine produces 49 HP more power than Volkswagen Passat CC. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Malibu reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 7.8 | |
|
The Volkswagen Passat CC is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Malibu consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat CC, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Malibu could require 255 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 73 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 1160 km on highway | ||
| Volkswagen Passat CC gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.86 m | no data | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 461 litres | 532 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Passat CC has more luggage space. Chevrolet Malibu has 71 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Passat CC. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`649 | 1`990 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 7600 | 16 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Malibu has
|
Volkswagen Passat CC has
| |