Chevrolet Malibu 2013 vs Chrysler 200 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 259 HP | 187 HP | |
| Torque: | 353 NM | 234 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.7 seconds | 9 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Malibu is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Malibu engine produces 72 HP more power than Chrysler 200, whereas torque is 119 NM more than Chrysler 200. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Malibu reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 8.5 | |
|
The Chrysler 200 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Malibu consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler 200, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Malibu could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 73 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| Chevrolet Malibu gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chevrolet Camaro, Chevrolet Equinox, Chevrolet Traverse | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jeep Cherokee, Jeep Renegade | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chevrolet Malibu might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.86 m | 4.89 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.49 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Malibu is 2 cm shorter than the Chrysler 200, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Malibu is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 461 litres | 453 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Chevrolet Malibu has 8 litres more trunk space than the Chrysler 200. The Chrysler 200 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.1 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`649 | 2`092 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Malibu has
|
Chrysler 200 has
| |