Chevrolet Malibu 2011 vs Mercedes E class 2009

 
Chevrolet Malibu
2011 - 2013
Mercedes E class
2009 - 2013
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.4 Petrol2.1 Diesel
Petrol engines (Chevrolet Malibu) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Mercedes E class) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences.
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 167 HP204 HP
Torque: 225 NM500 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.2 seconds7.2 seconds
Mercedes E class is a more dynamic driving.
Chevrolet Malibu engine produces 37 HP less power than Mercedes E class, whereas torque is 275 NM less than Mercedes E class. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Malibu reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.06.2
Real fuel consumption: 10.3 l/100km7.2 l/100km
The Mercedes E class is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Chevrolet Malibu consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes E class, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Malibu could require 270 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Malibu consumes 3.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes E class.
Fuel tank capacity: 73 litres59 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 910 km in combined cycle950 km in combined cycle
1210 km on highway1180 km on highway
700 km with real consumption810 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Rear wheel drive (RWD)
Front-wheel drive cars (Chevrolet Malibu) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mercedes E class) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 420'000 km350'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chevrolet Malibu engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 8 years15 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chevrolet Captiva, Opel AntaraInstalled on at least 13 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes ML, Mercedes A klase
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes E class might be a better choice in this respect.
Mercedes E klase 2009 2.1 engine: The engine has a long service life if it is serviced on time and has reasonable fuel consumption. The most common problems are caused by the engine chain tensioner and the fuel delivery system.

Dimensions

Length: 4.87 m4.87 m
Width: 1.86 m1.85 m
Height: 1.47 m1.47 m
Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Malibu and Mercedes E class are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 545 litres540 litres
Chevrolet Malibu has 5 litres more trunk space than the Mercedes E class.
Turning diameter: no data11.3 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`5392`390
Safety:
Chevrolet Malibu is better rated in child safety tests. The Mercedes E class scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 72009400
Pros and Cons: Chevrolet Malibu has
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • higher children safety
  • lower price
Mercedes E klase has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better safety assist technologies
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv