Chevrolet Malibu 2011 vs Mercedes E class 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 167 HP | 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 225 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
Mercedes E class is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Malibu engine produces 17 HP less power than Mercedes E class, whereas torque is 45 NM less than Mercedes E class. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Malibu reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 6.6 | |
|
The Mercedes E class is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Malibu consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes E class, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Malibu could require 180 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 73 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Chevrolet Malibu) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mercedes E class) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chevrolet Malibu engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chevrolet Captiva, Opel Antara | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes SLK | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes E class might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.47 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Malibu and Mercedes E class are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 545 litres | 540 litres | |
| Chevrolet Malibu has 5 litres more trunk space than the Mercedes E class. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.3 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`150 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Chevrolet Malibu is better rated in child safety tests. The Mercedes E class scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 10 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Malibu has
|
Mercedes E klase has
| |