Chevrolet Malibu 2004 vs Chrysler Sebring 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.9 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 243 HP | 235 HP | |
| Torque: | 325 NM | 339 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Chevrolet Malibu engine produces 8 HP more power than Chrysler Sebring, but torque is 14 NM less than Chrysler Sebring. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 9.9 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 61 litres | 64 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Chevrolet Malibu is smaller. Chevrolet Malibu is 7 cm shorter than the Chrysler Sebring, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Malibu is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 436 litres | 441 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
436 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Malibu is 0.5 metres more than that of the Chrysler Sebring, which means Chevrolet Malibu can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Malibu has
|
Chrysler Sebring has
| |