Chevrolet Malibu 2004 vs Alfa Romeo 166 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 3.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 220 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 315 NM | 289 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 seconds | 7.4 seconds | |
| Chevrolet Malibu engine produces 20 HP less power than Alfa Romeo 166, but torque is 26 NM more than Alfa Romeo 166. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Malibu reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.6 | 12.5 | |
|
The Chevrolet Malibu is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Malibu consumes 2.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo 166, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Malibu over 15,000 km in a year you can save 435 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 72 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 570 km in combined cycle | |
| Chevrolet Malibu gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.41 m | |
| Chevrolet Malibu is 6 cm longer than the Alfa Romeo 166, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Malibu is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 490 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`020 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Malibu has
|
Alfa Romeo 166 has
| |