Chevrolet Malibu 2004 vs Alfa Romeo 166 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 3.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 203 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 298 NM | 289 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 7.4 seconds | |
| Chevrolet Malibu engine produces 37 HP less power than Alfa Romeo 166, but torque is 9 NM more than Alfa Romeo 166. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 12.5 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 61 litres | 72 litres | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.41 m | |
| Chevrolet Malibu is 6 cm longer than the Alfa Romeo 166, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Malibu is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 436 litres | 490 litres | |
|
Alfa Romeo 166 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chevrolet Malibu has 54 litres less trunk space than the Alfa Romeo 166. This could mean that the Chevrolet Malibu uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`020 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Alfa Romeo 166 has
| |