Chevrolet Malibu 2004 vs Chevrolet Evanda 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 145 HP | 131 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 181 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
| Chevrolet Malibu engine produces 14 HP more power than Chevrolet Evanda, whereas torque is 29 NM more than Chevrolet Evanda. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 9.6 | |
|
The Chevrolet Malibu is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Malibu consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Evanda, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Malibu over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 61 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.44 m | |
| Chevrolet Malibu is 1 cm longer than the Chevrolet Evanda, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Malibu is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 436 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
436 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Malibu is 1.2 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Evanda, which means Chevrolet Malibu can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | 1`500 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Malibu has
|
Chevrolet Evanda has
| |