Chevrolet Malibu 1997 vs Chrysler Sebring 2001
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.1 Petrol | 2.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 173 HP | 203 HP | |
| Torque: | 264 NM | 262 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
| Chevrolet Malibu engine produces 30 HP less power than Chrysler Sebring, but torque is 2 NM more than Chrysler Sebring. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.8 | 10.6 | |
|
The Chevrolet Malibu is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Malibu consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Sebring, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Malibu over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 550 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
| 660 km on highway | 730 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.39 m | |
|
Chevrolet Malibu is smaller, but higher. Chevrolet Malibu and Chrysler Sebring are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 455 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
438 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Malibu is 0.1 metres less than that of the Chrysler Sebring. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | 1`990 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Malibu has
|
Chrysler Sebring has
| |