Chevrolet Malibu 1997 vs Chrysler Neon 1997
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 152 HP | 133 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 174 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
| Chevrolet Malibu engine produces 19 HP more power than Chrysler Neon, whereas torque is 36 NM more than Chrysler Neon. Despite the higher power, Chevrolet Malibu reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 | 8.5 | |
|
The Chrysler Neon is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Malibu consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Neon, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Malibu could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 550 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 710 km on highway | ||
| Chevrolet Malibu gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.37 m | |
|
Chevrolet Malibu is larger. Chevrolet Malibu is 48 cm longer than the Chrysler Neon, 5 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Malibu is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 364 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
464 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Malibu is 0.3 metres more than that of the Chrysler Neon. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | 1`600 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Malibu has
|
Chrysler Neon has
| |