Chevrolet Malibu 1997 vs Mazda Xedos 9 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 152 HP | 214 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 295 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
| Chevrolet Malibu engine produces 62 HP less power than Mazda Xedos 9, whereas torque is 85 NM less than Mazda Xedos 9. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 | 10.0 | |
|
The Chevrolet Malibu is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Malibu consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Xedos 9, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Malibu over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| Mazda Xedos 9 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.40 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Malibu is 2 cm longer than the Mazda Xedos 9, width is practically the same , while the height of Chevrolet Malibu is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
464 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Malibu is 0.4 metres less than that of the Mazda Xedos 9, which means Chevrolet Malibu can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | 1`985 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Malibu has
|
Mazda Xedos 9 has
| |