Chevrolet Malibu 1997 vs Chrysler Sebring 2001
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 152 HP | 203 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 262 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Sebring is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Malibu engine produces 51 HP less power than Chrysler Sebring, whereas torque is 52 NM less than Chrysler Sebring. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Malibu reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 | 10.6 | |
|
The Chevrolet Malibu is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Malibu consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Sebring, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Malibu over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 730 km on highway | ||
| Chevrolet Malibu gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.39 m | |
|
Chevrolet Malibu is smaller, but higher. Chevrolet Malibu and Chrysler Sebring are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 455 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
464 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Malibu is 0.1 metres less than that of the Chrysler Sebring. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | 1`990 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Malibu has
|
Chrysler Sebring has
| |