Chevrolet Malibu 2015 vs Ford Mustang 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Sedan | Coupe | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Chevrolet Malibu is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Ford Mustang has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Chevrolet Malibu is available with front wheel drive, while Ford Mustang can be equipped with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.0 | 3.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 124 - 250 HP | 193 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 - 350 NM | 298 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.7 - 8.6 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 - 8.7 | 12.0 | |
|
Chevrolet Malibu petrol engines consumes on average 4.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Mustang. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.92 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.35 m | |
| Chevrolet Malibu is 26 cm longer than the Ford Mustang, width is practically the same , while the height of Chevrolet Malibu is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 447 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`485 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 16 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Malibu has
|
Ford Mustang has
| |