Chevrolet Malibu 2015 vs Fiat Tipo 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chevrolet Malibu is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Fiat Tipo has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.0 (petrol) | 1.2 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 124 - 250 HP | 95 - 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 - 350 NM | 127 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.7 - 8.6 seconds | 9.7 - 11.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 - 8.7 | 4.1 - 6.3 | |
|
Chevrolet Malibu petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Fiat Tipo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.92 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Chevrolet Malibu is larger, but slightly lower. Chevrolet Malibu is 39 cm longer than the Fiat Tipo, 6 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Malibu is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 447 litres | 520 litres | |
|
Fiat Tipo has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chevrolet Malibu has 73 litres less trunk space than the Fiat Tipo. This could mean that the Chevrolet Malibu uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`485 | ~ 1`731 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 10 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Malibu has
|
Fiat Tipo has
| |