Chevrolet Malibu 2015 vs Chrysler 200 2014
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Chevrolet Malibu is available only with front wheel drive, while Chrysler 200 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.0 | 2.4 - 3.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 124 - 250 HP | 187 - 300 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 - 350 NM | 234 - 355 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.7 - 8.6 seconds | 6.5 - 9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 - 8.7 | 8.5 - 10.2 | |
|
Chevrolet Malibu petrol engines consumes on average 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chrysler 200. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.92 m | 4.89 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.49 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Malibu is 4 cm longer than the Chrysler 200, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Malibu is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 447 litres | 463 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Chevrolet Malibu has 16 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler 200. This could mean that the Chevrolet Malibu uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.1 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`485 | ~ 2`141 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Malibu has
|
Chrysler 200 has
| |