Chevrolet Malibu 2015 vs Audi S6 2014
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Chevrolet Malibu is available with front wheel drive, while Audi S6 can be equipped with four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.0 | 4.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 124 - 250 HP | 450 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 - 350 NM | 550 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.7 - 8.6 seconds | 4.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 - 8.7 | 9.2 | |
|
Chevrolet Malibu petrol engines consumes on average 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Audi S6. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.92 m | 4.93 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Malibu is 1 cm shorter than the Audi S6, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Malibu is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 447 litres | 530 litres | |
|
Audi S6 has more luggage space. Chevrolet Malibu has 83 litres less trunk space than the Audi S6. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`485 | ~ 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 33 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Malibu has
|
Audi S6 has
| |