Chevrolet Malibu 2013 vs Hyundai Equus 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Chevrolet Malibu is available with front wheel drive, while Hyundai Equus can be equipped with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 | 3.8 - 5.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 197 - 259 HP | 334 - 430 HP | |
| Torque: | 259 - 353 NM | 395 - 510 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.7 - 9 seconds | 5.8 - 6.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 - 9.5 | 10.9 - 12.3 | |
|
Chevrolet Malibu petrol engines consumes on average 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Hyundai Equus. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.86 m | 5.16 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.49 m | |
|
Chevrolet Malibu is smaller. Chevrolet Malibu is 30 cm shorter than the Hyundai Equus, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Malibu is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 461 litres | 474 litres | |
| Chevrolet Malibu has 13 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Equus. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`875 | ~ 2`465 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7600 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Malibu has
|
| |