Chevrolet Malibu 2004 vs Chevrolet Evanda 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chevrolet Malibu is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Chevrolet Evanda has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 2.2 - 3.9 | 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 145 - 243 HP | 131 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 - 325 NM | 181 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 seconds | 10.7 - 12.5 seconds | |
| In general, Chevrolet Malibu are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Chevrolet Evanda. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 - 9.6 | 8.8 - 9.6 | |
|
On average, the Chevrolet Malibu petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Chevrolet Evanda. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.44 m | |
| Chevrolet Malibu is 1 cm longer than the Chevrolet Evanda, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Malibu is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 436 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
436 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Malibu is 1.2 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Evanda, which means Chevrolet Malibu can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | ~ 1`500 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Malibu has
|
Chevrolet Evanda has
| |