Chevrolet Malibu 2004 vs Alfa Romeo 166 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chevrolet Malibu is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Alfa Romeo 166 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 2.2 - 3.9 (petrol) | 2.0 - 3.2 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 145 - 243 HP | 150 - 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 - 325 NM | 181 - 385 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 seconds | 7.4 - 9.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.6 | 7.2 - 13.0 | |
|
Chevrolet Malibu petrol engines consumes on average 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Alfa Romeo 166. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.42 m | |
| Chevrolet Malibu is 6 cm longer than the Alfa Romeo 166, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Malibu is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 436 litres | 490 litres | |
|
Alfa Romeo 166 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chevrolet Malibu has 54 litres less trunk space than the Alfa Romeo 166. This could mean that the Chevrolet Malibu uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`931 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Malibu has
|
Alfa Romeo 166 has
| |