Chevrolet Malibu 1997 vs Chrysler Neon 1994
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chevrolet Malibu is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Chrysler Neon has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 2.4 - 3.1 | 1.8 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 152 - 173 HP | 115 - 133 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 - 264 NM | 152 - 175 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 - 9.5 seconds | 8.8 - 11.1 seconds | |
| In general, Chevrolet Malibu are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Chrysler Neon. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 - 10.2 | 8.0 - 8.5 | |
|
Chevrolet Malibu petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Chrysler Neon. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.37 m | |
|
Chevrolet Malibu is larger. Chevrolet Malibu is 48 cm longer than the Chrysler Neon, 5 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Malibu is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 364 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
464 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Malibu is 0.2 metres more than that of the Chrysler Neon. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | ~ 1`610 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Malibu has
|
Chrysler Neon has
| |