Chevrolet Malibu 1997 vs Mazda Xedos 9 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chevrolet Malibu is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Mazda Xedos 9 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 2.4 - 3.1 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 152 - 173 HP | 146 - 214 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 - 264 NM | 180 - 295 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 - 9.5 seconds | 8.6 - 11.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 - 10.2 | 9.0 - 10.1 | |
|
Chevrolet Malibu petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda Xedos 9. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.40 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Malibu is 2 cm longer than the Mazda Xedos 9, width is practically the same , while the height of Chevrolet Malibu is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
464 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Malibu is 0.4 metres less than that of the Mazda Xedos 9, which means Chevrolet Malibu can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | ~ 1`951 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Malibu has
|
Mazda Xedos 9 has
| |