Chevrolet Lacetti 2005 vs Mazda 3 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 165 NM | 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 12.4 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Lacetti is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Lacetti engine produces 17 HP more power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Mazda 3. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Lacetti reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 7.8 | |
|
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Lacetti consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Lacetti could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Lacetti is 3 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Lacetti is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 405 litres | 413 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 675 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Chevrolet Lacetti has 8 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 3. This could mean that the Chevrolet Lacetti uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.3 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`695 | 1`700 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.8/10 | 8.2/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Lacetti has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |