Chevrolet Lacetti 2005 vs Mitsubishi Lancer 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 109 HP | 109 HP | |
| Torque: | 150 NM | 143 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 14 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Lacetti is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Lacetti and Mitsubishi Lancer have the same engine power, but Chevrolet Lacetti torque is 7 NM more than Mitsubishi Lancer. Chevrolet Lacetti reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 7.0 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Lancer is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Lacetti consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Lacetti could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Lancer gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 21 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chevrolet Aveo, Chevrolet Cruze, Chevrolet Nubira | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Colt, Smart ForFour, Mitsubishi Xpander | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Lancer might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Chevrolet Lacetti engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Chevrolet Lacetti 2005 1.6 engine: Durable, easy to repair, long-lasting engine, not very demanding on fuel quality.
Engine often leaks oil, which tends to cause other problems. The EGR valve can also cause problems, and many users choose to ... More about Chevrolet Lacetti 2005 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.49 m | |
|
Chevrolet Lacetti is smaller. Chevrolet Lacetti is 6 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Lancer, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Lacetti is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 405 litres | 400 litres | |
| Chevrolet Lacetti has 5 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Lancer. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`660 | 1`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.8/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Lacetti has
|
Mitsubishi Lancer has
| |