Chevrolet Lacetti 2005 vs Mazda 3 2003
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 94 HP | 105 HP | |
Torque: | 131 NM | 145 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 seconds | 11 seconds | |
Mazda 3 is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Lacetti engine produces 11 HP less power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 14 NM less than Mazda 3. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Lacetti reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 7.2 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
1050 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
720 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
Chevrolet Lacetti gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 6 years | 16 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chevrolet Aveo, Chevrolet Kalos | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda Xedos 6, Mazda MX-3 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda 3 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Mazda 3 2003 1.6 engine: This engine is widely regarded as reliable, though it can develop certain issues over time. One of the most common problems is increased oil consumption, often starting after 120,000 km. This is frequently ... More about Mazda 3 2003 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.52 m | 4.49 m | |
Width: | 1.73 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.45 m | 1.46 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Lacetti is 3 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Lacetti is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 405 litres | 413 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 675 litres | |
Despite its longer length, Chevrolet Lacetti has 8 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 3. This could mean that the Chevrolet Lacetti uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 10.3 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`695 | 1`675 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | high | |
Average price (€): | 1200 | 1000 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 6.8/10 | 8.2/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Lacetti has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |