Chevrolet Lacetti 2005 vs Volkswagen Golf 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 109 HP | 102 HP | |
| Torque: | 150 NM | 148 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Lacetti is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Lacetti engine produces 7 HP more power than Volkswagen Golf, whereas torque is 2 NM more than Volkswagen Golf. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Lacetti reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 7.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Golf is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Lacetti consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Lacetti could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Lacetti consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
| 730 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chevrolet Aveo, Chevrolet Cruze, Chevrolet Nubira | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Audi A3, Volkswagen Touran | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volkswagen Golf might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Chevrolet Lacetti 2005 1.6 engine: Durable, easy to repair, long-lasting engine, not very demanding on fuel quality.
Engine often leaks oil, which tends to cause other problems. The EGR valve can also cause problems, and many users choose to ... More about Chevrolet Lacetti 2005 1.6 engine Volkswagen Golf 2007 1.6 engine: This engine is simple and reliable, rarely causing significant issues for owners. Fluctuating idle speed is often linked to a clogged fuel pump strainer or air leaks in the intake system. If vibrations or ... More about Volkswagen Golf 2007 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.47 m | |
| Chevrolet Lacetti is 2 cm longer than the Volkswagen Golf, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Lacetti is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 505 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1410 litres | 1495 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Golf has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Chevrolet Lacetti uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Golf (by 85 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.9 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 1`765 kg | 1`900 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`250 kg | 1`278 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 515 kg | 622 kg | |
| Chevrolet Lacetti load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 21 procentiem less than Volkswagen Golf. Therefore, Volkswagen Golf is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.8/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Lacetti has
|
Volkswagen Golf has
| |