Chevrolet Lacetti 2005 vs Skoda Octavia 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.9 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Chevrolet Lacetti) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Skoda Octavia) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 109 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 150 NM | 235 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Skoda Octavia is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Lacetti engine produces 1 HP less power than Skoda Octavia, whereas torque is 85 NM less than Skoda Octavia. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Lacetti reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 5.0 | |
|
The Skoda Octavia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Lacetti consumes 5.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Octavia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Lacetti could require 810 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 1100 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| Skoda Octavia gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Chevrolet Lacetti 2005 1.6 engine: Durable, easy to repair, long-lasting engine, not very demanding on fuel quality.
Engine often leaks oil, which tends to cause other problems. The EGR valve can also cause problems, and many users choose to ... More about Chevrolet Lacetti 2005 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Lacetti is 7 cm longer than the Skoda Octavia, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1410 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`765 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.8/10 | 7.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Skoda Octavia has
| |