Chevrolet Lacetti 2005 vs Skoda Octavia 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Chevrolet Lacetti) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Skoda Octavia) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 109 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 150 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
|
Skoda Octavia is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Lacetti engine produces 31 HP less power than Skoda Octavia, whereas torque is 170 NM less than Skoda Octavia. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Lacetti reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 5.7 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Octavia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Lacetti consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Octavia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Lacetti could require 345 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Lacetti consumes 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Octavia. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 1170 km on highway | ||
| 730 km with real consumption | 960 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Octavia gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Chevrolet Lacetti 2005 1.6 engine: Durable, easy to repair, long-lasting engine, not very demanding on fuel quality.
Engine often leaks oil, which tends to cause other problems. The EGR valve can also cause problems, and many users choose to ... More about Chevrolet Lacetti 2005 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.47 m | |
| Chevrolet Lacetti is 1 cm longer than the Skoda Octavia, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Lacetti is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 580 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1410 litres | 1620 litres | |
|
Skoda Octavia has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Chevrolet Lacetti uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Octavia (by 210 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 1`765 kg | 2`010 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`250 kg | 1`425 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 515 kg | 585 kg | |
| Chevrolet Lacetti load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 14 procentiem less than Skoda Octavia. Therefore, Skoda Octavia is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 2400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.8/10 | 7.9/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Lacetti has
|
Skoda Octavia has
| |