Chevrolet Lacetti 2007 vs Renault Kangoo 2008
| Body: | Hatchback | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 121 HP | 85 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | 16 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Lacetti is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Lacetti engine produces 36 HP more power than Renault Kangoo, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Renault Kangoo. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Lacetti reaches 100 km/h speed 6.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Kangoo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Lacetti consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kangoo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Lacetti could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Lacetti consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kangoo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km with real consumption | 930 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Kangoo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Chevrolet Captiva | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Kangoo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Chevrolet Lacetti engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.21 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.80 m | |
| Chevrolet Lacetti is 9 cm longer than the Renault Kangoo, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Lacetti is 36 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 275 litres | 438 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1977 litres | |
|
Renault Kangoo has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chevrolet Lacetti has 163 litres less trunk space than the Renault Kangoo. This could mean that the Chevrolet Lacetti uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Lacetti is 0.6 metres less than that of the Renault Kangoo, which means Chevrolet Lacetti can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`650 | 1`954 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Lacetti has
|
Renault Kangoo has
| |