Chevrolet Lacetti 2007 vs Kia Ceed 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 121 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 255 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Lacetti is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Lacetti engine produces 6 HP more power than Kia Ceed, whereas torque is 25 NM more than Kia Ceed. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Lacetti reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 4.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 5.8 l/100km | |
|
The Kia Ceed is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Lacetti consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Lacetti could require 150 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Lacetti consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 1120 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km with real consumption | 910 km with real consumption | ||
| Kia Ceed gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 320'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chevrolet Lacetti engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Chevrolet Captiva | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Hyundai i30, Hyundai Accent, Kia Venga | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Kia Ceed might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.24 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.48 m | |
| Chevrolet Lacetti is 6 cm longer than the Kia Ceed, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Lacetti is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 275 litres | 340 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1300 litres | |
|
Kia Ceed has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chevrolet Lacetti has 65 litres less trunk space than the Kia Ceed. This could mean that the Chevrolet Lacetti uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Lacetti is 0.4 metres less than that of the Kia Ceed, which means Chevrolet Lacetti can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`650 | 1`820 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Lacetti has
|
Kia Ceed has
| |