Chevrolet Lacetti 2005 vs Audi A3 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 109 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 150 NM | 155 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
| Chevrolet Lacetti engine produces 7 HP less power than Audi A3, whereas torque is 5 NM less than Audi A3. Despite less power, Chevrolet Lacetti reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
The Audi A3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Lacetti consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Lacetti could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Lacetti consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A3. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
| 730 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chevrolet Aveo, Chevrolet Cruze, Chevrolet Nubira | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf, Skoda Octavia | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Chevrolet Lacetti 2005 1.6 engine: Durable, easy to repair, long-lasting engine, not very demanding on fuel quality.
Engine often leaks oil, which tends to cause other problems. The EGR valve can also cause problems, and many users choose to ... More about Chevrolet Lacetti 2005 1.6 engine Audi A3 2004 1.6 engine: Owners of vehicles with this engine often report difficulties starting in cold weather. Carbon buildup tends to cause sticking in the intake valves, throttle body, and EGR valve, leading to performance ... More about Audi A3 2004 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.29 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.42 m | |
| Chevrolet Lacetti is 1 cm longer than the Audi A3, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Lacetti is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 275 litres | 370 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1045 litres | 1120 litres | |
|
Audi A3 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Chevrolet Lacetti uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi A3 (by 75 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Lacetti is 0.3 metres less than that of the Audi A3. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`650 kg | 1`825 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`175 kg | 1`265 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 475 kg | 560 kg | |
| Chevrolet Lacetti load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 18 procentiem less than Audi A3. Therefore, Audi A3 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Lacetti has
|
Audi A3 has
| |