Chevrolet Lacetti 2005 vs Mitsubishi Lancer 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 1.8 (petrol) | 1.5 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Mitsubishi Lancer is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 94 - 122 HP | 109 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 131 - 165 NM | 143 - 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 - 11.6 seconds | 9.5 - 14 seconds | |
| In general, Mitsubishi Lancer are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Chevrolet Lacetti. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 - 8.8 | 6.1 - 8.4 | |
|
Chevrolet Lacetti petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Lancer. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.49 m | |
|
Chevrolet Lacetti is smaller. Chevrolet Lacetti is 6 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Lancer, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Lacetti is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 405 litres | 400 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1225 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10 meters | |
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`682 kg | ~ 1`831 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.8/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Lacetti has
|
Mitsubishi Lancer has
| |